The Criticism Machine is a series of articles in which we use Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT) to generate arts criticisms using cultural theories as a point of departure. We acknowledge that GPT is a machine learning model and has limitations in understanding the nuances and complexities of cultural theories. Therefore, we take responsibility for ensuring that the generated critiques are consistent with the theoretical perspectives we use as a starting point. We have carefully reviewed and edited the GPT-generated texts to ensure accuracy, coherence, and relevance to the cultural theories being discussed. We have attributed ownership and authorship to ensure transparency and accountability, and have engaged in critical thinking and creativity to shape the final product. We have used GPTs trained on diverse and inclusive datasets to minimize the risk of bias and discrimination, and have taken steps to protect data privacy and security in compliance with relevant privacy regulations and laws. Our goal is to generate thought-provoking and insightful commentary on art and culture, while acknowledging the role of technology in shaping the ways we produce and consume cultural content. We welcome feedback from our readers to help us improve our critiques.
please send feedback by reaching out on our Instagram direct message @formfora or email mukholitreva@gmail.com
for this edition of the criticism machine we have focused on the Guy Debord’s Society of the Spectacle as our point of departure, my contribution to this has been prompting and ensuring the fidelity of the ideas discussed in this, I am interested in exploring GPTs as tools of cultural analysis. The ability to juxtapose multiple public datasets and cultural theories has yielded for me a deeper understanding of my cultural environment and I wish to explore this more.